On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: >> Possibly the use of md5 would be more palatable to the security area >> if the protocol were Experimental rather than Standards-Track. If the >> authors and chairs would be willing to make that change > > not a chance in hell. the vendors went out on a limb. operators same.
yea, so ... without my co-chair-special-garments on I'm not sure experimental heads us in the direction of ubiquitous secure interdomain routing. We seem to be in a bit of a jam :( I don't think SIDR is going to be able to, by declaration, get opensource implementations of AO to appear. I don't see non-open-source implementations on the server side for tcp-md5 sadly either, but at least fbsd/obsd/linux have tcp-md5 support. -chris _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
