Inline
On 8/5/11 8:39 AM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Hi Bert,
Many thx for your comment .. I was not able to stay at the IETF till the SIDR
session.
If that is the case the draft-ymbk-bgp-origin-validation-mib is just completely not ready for adoption until it contains bare
minimum which will allow operators to use it.
The MIB module is not ready for WGLC, I agree on that.
In my feel, the adoption question is more of: Does the WG want to work on
these 2 MIB modules. The exact content then needs to be agreed on by the WG.
If you want to see another individual draft with better content first.. I have
no problem with that, up to the chair to decide I think.
It would be insane to list 1 million of valid prefixes as opposed to little fractionof them being in question. Whoever authored
that draft needs to develop a bit more real network operational experience :)
I did not author it, but I am now working on it.
I am a MIB/SMI/SNMP guy. Not a router or BGP or RPKI expert.
Constructive input is helpfull
The table (as in the current I-D) has this attribute:
bgpVRTValid OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER { unknown(1), valid(2), invalid(3) }
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This is indicates if the state of the roa associated with
this row."
DEFVAL { unknown }
::= { bgpValROATableEntry 5 }
So my answer to your comments:
- listing the status (unknown, valid or invalid) will only result in
MORE entries than just listing the valid ones.
- My understanding is/was that the table might have some 300K entries
But that is from hearsay.
Anyways, that is still a lot, I Understand that. And therefor, proper
indexing is important. I need to know what sort of queries operators
are most likely to do on this table.
If you (with lots of operator experience I assume) or others can help
me with that, that would be great.
Bert
Best regards,
R.
During the discussion at the SIDR WG session at IETF81 we
found that the bgpVRTValid attribute in that table makes no
sense, because we do not have that info. These are ALL
validated ROAs (or better validated prefixes) as I understand
it.
Bert
On 8/5/11 8:09 AM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Hi,
Just looking at draft-ymbk-bgp-origin-validation-mib may I ask what
would be the root OID string to start SNMP tree walk (or set the trap)
to list all INVALID or NOT_FOUND BGP entries ?
Rgs,
R.
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
