Sean
I would get less confused if you referred to draft-ietf-sidr-res-certs as
[ID.sidr-res-certs] and not as [ID.sidr-res-cert-profile] ; there are so many
sidr I-Ds and name changes and I lose track of what is which even without two
similar but different names for one of them:-(
"o BGPSEC Router Certificates MUST include the BGPSEC EKU defined in
Section 3.9.5."
Should that be 3.1.3.1? (or is it a section in
draft-ietf-sidr-res-cert-profile:-)
And I find it hard to parse
' The validation procedure used for BGPSEC Router Certificates is
identical to the validation procedure described in Section 7 of
[ID.sidr-res-cert-profile] except that where "this specification"
refers to [ID.sidr-res-cert-profile] in that profile in this profile
"this specification" is this document.'
Perhaps
' The validation procedure used for BGPSEC Router Certificates is
identical to the validation procedure described in Section 7 of
[ID.sidr-res-cert-profile] except that "this specification"
should be taken as referring to this document.'
I would find it clearer still if draft-ietf-sidr-res-certs section 7
used 'this profile' instead of 'this specification'
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Turner" <turn...@ieca.com>
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
