Eric,

1- Yes, there is a need for global coordination for alg transition, under the design presented. If you have an alternative proposal, please share it. This design was originally documented in June, 2010, in an individual I-D authored by me. It has been briefed at several SIDR WG meetings, starting at IETF 78 in July, 2010. This is not new.

2- Not exactly. The milestones, as well as the alg suite spec, will appear in a revised version of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-algs. Any operational problem that requires a delay in any transition phase would be brought to the attention of the IESG (if the SIDR WG is no longer active) requesting that a this RFC be re-issued, with new milestone values for the affected phase(s).

Steve
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to