> From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:sidr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Jakob Heitz
>
> The difference is that today's updates all have the same urgency.
> BGPSEC is not urgent. It doesn't matter if you don't receive a
> signature for a few minutes.
> An UNREACH is not signed.

[WEG] I don't totally agree with this characterization. If the BGPSec info 
triggers a recalculation of bestpath from what was chosen when the unsigned 
update came through, this has the potential to drive 2x the work, essentially 
take 2x longer for convergence, plus push another round of updates to 
downstream neighbors, another reprogram of the FIB, etc. Seems to me by the 
time we've gained any benefit of saving updates for later because the box is 
busy, we've triggered a far worse potential death spiral on a busy box. 
Processing a few additional updates is rather pale in comparison to having to 
consistently recalculate a non-trivial percentage of the table when the box 
gets "busy."
Similar to buffering and QoS, you can't get something for nothing here, and 
there are limits to where deferred processing can help to smooth out peaks vs. 
simply throwing more capacity at the problem, especially in the land of often 
underutilized multi-core systems.

Wes George

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable 
proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to 
copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the 
contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be 
unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and 
any printout.
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to