> -----Original Message----- > From: Russ White [mailto:ru...@riw.us] > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 8:40 PM > To: Shankar K A > Cc: Jakob Heitz; sidr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates > > > > But strictly speaking, IMO we should only accept signed updates, > because it's the number of AS that we add in the update that we are > protecting. > > By accepting unsigned update we may accept unprotected path > information. > > Precisely my point.
What is the value of that? Does this now allow me to send passwords in the clear on the internet? -- Jakob Heitz. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
