Hi Douglas, On Mar 9, 2012, at 4:10 PM, Montgomery, Douglas wrote:
> At least part of my quantum state was there. > > If draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-00 becomes the way to control stale > updates, the two issues will be intertwined. > > I was just pointing out that you need the ability to key, re-key anyway, > independent of its use in the above. Agreed, and I though we captured it with Sections 1 and 2 of the document. Roque. > Wonder where else my qbits were that week? > > dougm > -- > Doug Montgomery Mgr. Internet & Scalable Systems Research / ITL / NIST > > > > > > > On 3/9/12 9:54 AM, "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > >>> If rekeying is our approach to control the validity period of stale >>> updates, then the issues become inter-related. >> >> shame you could not make the san diego interim >> >> randy > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
