On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net> wrote: > Hi, > >> And intradomain BGP speakers do not use bgpsec (ebgp sessions only). > > > I do not understand. How a BGP Update will transit via an AS where each > router is a real BGP speaker and where as some proposed BGP mandatory > AS_PATH attribute is not present ?
The last sentence, it doesn't parse quite clearly for me... could you re-state it? > > Are you assuming each AS today is BGP Free with full mesh of MPLS/IP tunnel > ASBR to ASBR as transport ? Even in this case ASBRs are connected directly > or indirectly (RRs) via IBGP. no assumption was made of this sort. > As you proposing to remove AS_PATH selection criteria from best path for > updates which come over IBGP ? What happens if you need to compare paths no > received over EBGP and IBGP on a given BGP speaker ? I think what you want is actually sort of discussed in: <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-02#section-4> -chris _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
