On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net> wrote:
> In my view we should do all BGP processing based on "legacy" attributes and
> BGPSEC should be a hint to the local operator on how to treat the update.
i think that's the point of the current spec though... inbound updates
(on BGPSEC capable bgp sessions) which include BGPSEC information get
validated by the local router and 'colored' by route-map/policy as the
operator sees fit.
route-map in-cust permit 10
match bgpsec valid
add community 2914:valid
this is the functionality you are asking for, yes?
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
