On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:52:29PM +0200, Robert Raszuk wrote: > I very much agree with both Paul and Wes that new BGP version number > or at least new set of AFIs would be the best way to smoothly > migrate unsecure BGP to secure one.
If it's not backward compatible, sure. > I have not seem anyone resisting that idea yet with real technical > arguments against it ;) See my migration comments earlier. If you think you can get a given SP that might be willing to install BGPSEC at the edges also willing to upgrade every other BGP speaker inside their AS... you're more optimistic than I. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
