On Oct 23, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > > but it is in the bgp decision process. it is prettly low down, but > could be used for traffic engineering or other, less nice, influencing > of the decision process.
s/could be/is/ > hence, bgpsec should probably should protect it. Agreed. I would also note that this has been brought up here many times (e.g., [1]), glad to see folks giving it consideration now, and hoping it can find it's way into a future threats document. -danny [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg03464.html _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr