On Oct 23, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> 
> but it is in the bgp decision process.  it is prettly low down, but
> could be used for traffic engineering or other, less nice, influencing
> of the decision process.

s/could be/is/

> hence, bgpsec should probably should protect it.


Agreed.  

I would also note that this has been brought up here many times (e.g., [1]), 
glad to see folks giving it consideration now, and hoping it can find it's way 
into a future threats document.

-danny

[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg03464.html
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to