On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Shane Amante <sh...@castlepoint.net> wrote: >>> Second, there is this sentence: "BGP itself ***does not include >>> semantics*** that >>> preclude what many perceive as route leaks." ... That statement reads to me >>> as >>> stating that _because_ BGP does include semantics to solve for route-leaks, >>> it's >>> out-of-scope for PATHSEC. >> >> read the sentence again, I think you misread it. > > I don't think so.
you did: "does not include" "does include" missing word important. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
