On Dec 12, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melni...@isode.com> wrote:
> Dear WG participants, > > I would like to initiate 2+ weeks poll (ending on December 31st 2012) > regarding acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02.txt. Please reply > to questions listed below. Send your replies to the mailing list or directly > to WG chairs <sidr-cha...@tools.ietf.org>. I would like to avoid extended > discussions of technical issues at this time, as I think people already made > up their minds. However including pointers to earlier discussions is fine. > > Alexey, > on behald of SIDR chairs. > > ---------------- > > 1) Is the problem described/solved by draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02 > actually a problem that the WG needs to address? (Answer: yes or no. > Additional information is welcomed, but I don't want people to repeat the > whole discussion.) Yes, it is a problem that I believe the WG should address…. I don't think it is the most important issue on our plate but I do think it is worth addressing. > 2) If you answered "yes" to the question #1, please also answer the following > question: > > Is draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02 a reasonable starting point to become a > WG document? Please choose one of the following: > > > a) Ready for Adoption (whether or not you have some specific issues with it. > Also, this answer is unrelated to whether this should be a separate draft or > a part of an existing draft). A. I believe that 1: starting from somewhere is useful (and this is somewhere) and 2: once the WG owns the doc it can make whatever changes it wants (well, is able to reach consensus on :-P) > > b) Needs more work BEFORE Adoption > > c) Should not be adopted. In particular this mean that you don't believe any > amount of work on the proposed draft will address your issues. So any > solution to this problem should be a new draft written from scratch. > > d) Abstain/don't care > > > 3) If you answered "a" or "b" above, please also answer the following > question: > > Does this need to be in a standalone draft, or can it be incorporated into > another existing WG draft? When answering this question please only base your > answer on technical reasons, in particular please leave the decision on who > is going to edit the document (if it is standalone) to WG chairs. What? There is no "Abstain/don't care" option for 3? ;-) W > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > -- "Does Emacs have the Buddha nature? Why not? It has bloody well everything else..." _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
