Chris Morrow writes: > I believe the authors wanted this to progress, I believe there was > recently (8/29/2013) an updated version submitted, does it deal with the > outstanding comments? (the diff doesn't show much more than > boilerplate-like changes) > > Should this be WGLC'd at this point? >
Hi, A couple comments. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-03 refers to "[I-D.ietf-sidr-pfx-validate]", but that has been published as rfc6811. The paragraph in Section 2 where that reference occurs says: =============== Note that routers do not perform prefix origin validation (compute the validation state as defined in [I-D.ietf-sidr-pfx-validate]) for IBGP learnt routes. =============== ... but rfc6811 does not prohibit performing prefix origin validation for IBGP learnt routes. In a network where all edge routers are capable and configured to perform prefix origin validation on EBGP learnt routes it should not be necessary to perform that function also on IBGP learnt routes, but in general doing so should not be prohibited. The current statement in draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-03 is too strongly worded. Thanks. Jay B. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
