yes, the erratum exploded into a doc revision. and then, if we're (excuse the royal we when you are doing the heavy lifting) issuing a new doc, well of course it should be modern and correct. primrose path indeed.
personally i have no dog in this fight. both directions have my sympathies. i do have sympathies if/where any of the modernizations have semantic impact. beyond that, well, i certainly have no claim to document flexibility per se :) randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
