> Would it make sense to have the name that goes in the router > certificate then be something like “ROUTER-#-32_bit_BGP_Identifier” > where the # gets incremented everytime there’s a new key? For those > that love hard coded lengths this might be an issue if the # grows, > but is that the only drawback?
if you have to go down that path, and i am unsure of it, then use a fixed length router# and wrap. and keep in mind that bgp_id is unique only within an AS. randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
