The minutes note consensus in the meeting on several topics. I'm attempting to
capture them here.
The mailing list is always the final word on consensus. If you object to any
of the following, you should speak on list now!
If I've missed something noted in the minutes, you should speak on the list now!
If you think there was consensus on a topic not noted in the minutes - see
previous message about the deadline for corrections.
In the discussion of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol:
consensus to remove origin validation
check from this document and add text explaining the oddly appearing
case of OV invalid, BGPSEC path authentic/valid.
Discussion has not converged <consensus that there was no consensus on
signature choice>
In the discussion of draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration:
1) What status should this document be?
Concensus appeared to be the same status as BGPSEC
2) Should this document be merged into BGPSEC-Protocol
Concensus appeared to be not to merge
3) Should this document "Update" BGPSEC-Protocol
Concensus appeared to be that an update header is not needed if both
In the discussion of Router Keying Communication of cert to CA:
Concensus <sic> appeared to be that one ASN per router certificate is
sufficient.
--Sandy
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
