I posed some questions about this in my WGLC review of bgpsec spec, but haven't heard anything back. Current schedule has this being evaluated by IESG prior to our next meeting. If we need to discuss during the meeting in Dallas, we could certainly delay processing of the document. It has a normative block on the bgpsec spec, so it's not like it's getting published right away anyway.
Thanks, Wes On 2/6/15, 11:15 AM, "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com> wrote: >has the wg really looked at 5.2 and 5.3 with respect to how the ibgp >hacks affect the bgpsec spec? > >randy This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
