On Apr 23, 2015, at 21:50, Richard Hansen <rhan...@bbn.com> wrote: > On 2015-04-21 18:49, Sean Turner wrote: >> so I'd probably just leave it. > > Are you saying that the errata process is too heavyweight for a minor > editorial typo like this? If so, is there a more appropriate way to > report an editorial typo so that it will be fixed in a bis if/when one > is ever produced? > > Thanks, > Richard
Sorry definitely wasn't clear there - errata is the right way to handle this. I jumped to how I’d mark it if I were AD :) There’s three ways: approved, rejected, and HDFU (hold for document update). I was opting for HFDU. spt _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
