really do appreciate review. do not appreciate pdfs of word docs; makes copy paste and commenting back a major pain. though i have come to suspect that is one of your goals. so i will not comment on your comments in that pdf, though i adopted/adapted the majority, with which i agreed.
> - I don't consider myself to be on the hook for a "torn Euro" protocol back in 2007, you really did say you would do it. but this year it the kook kids would use a blockchain contract; that'll be a fun section to write :) > - I think the doc should distinguish between transfers of "live" > address space vs. transfers of space that is not currently in > use. The former are more complex tan the latter and thus merit a > different discussion operationally, you do not have a solid proof of [dis-]use. and i do not see how they should be treated differently. prudence says do it as if it is live. > - the text does not yet adequately describe the steps that need to > take place when the Buyer or Seller are not directly under a Swing > Point. sent text > - the TAO doc described a procedure for resource transfer that > avoids the concern you cited in Section 5. good. when we get to that doc, we can then deal i did not finish until after the dreadline. so all will be revealed in two weeks. for a small fee, early peeks might be available. randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
