Speaking as one of the wg co-chairs:
From the minutes, here are a couple of action items:
In the discussion of adverse-actions draft:
• doug montgomery: in detection, worth addressing pub
point might offer different views to different people/regions
of the world.
• steve: didn't address that. certainly is possible if
the primary detection is done by the INR themselves, but they
keep getting rosy view. INR might have options for where to
get resources. please send email to list so we remember to
talk about this
• steve: rob, please send examples. what we can do is
give examples to make it clear that we did intend to include
this.
• steve: rudiger: Did intend for this to be
comprehensive. detection is going to be the same. better
job of explaining the implications of these things. want to
make reader understand this is a concern because of this
points.
(From the meetecho audio, these requests were a joint response to a series of
comments from Rob, Randy and Ruediger that are noted in the minutes.)
• sandy: recall happening two registries had issued same
resources to different people. how does that fit?
• steve: send that to the list, need to think about that
In discussion of working group adoption:
Sandy:
...
• if authors want adoption, authors should request it from
the list
In discussion of route leaks
• sandy: found it listed as a tech report, can be
described as publicly available document.
I have used the meetecho recordings to note the following possible
modifications to the minutes:
At 1:57:42 (on the meetecho display), Randy says:
I think I agree with Steve on the issue of hosted CAs.
I’m not sure that is the same as what the minutes say ("hosted CA" vs "managed
repository"):
I agree with kent on managed repositories.
[No, I did not review the entire audio, I just heard that in listening for the
following exchange.]
The minutes say:
• ??? (ripe): like idea, but where do you want to go
with this?
• matthias:
• (ripe): idea good, don't support a mandate that all
CAs must do this, but think it's good practice. idea is good
The recording does not show the people at mike, but from the audio I think this
is Kaveh Ranjbar.
—Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
