Hi Sandy, Technical question. We plan to submit an update before the cut-off date - no major overhaul but we have some changes.
Can we just submit a new version as an official document, or should we just re-submit this one, and do the update in a week or two? Thanks Tim > On 03 Mar 2016, at 19:20, Sandra Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > > The responses stream ended quickly, but there were enough to call wg support > for adoption. > > Authors, please do submit as an official sidr wg document. > > —Sandy, speaking as one of the co-chairs > > > On Dec 9, 2015, at 6:08 PM, Sandra Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> As noted in the minutes, the authors of >> draft-tbruijnzeels-sidr-validation-local-cache-02 request that the working >> group adopt this work as a wg work item. >> >> A working group adoption poll starts now and will end 14 days from now on 23 >> December. >> >> Please respond on the list to say whether you support adoption of this work >> as a working group work item AND whether you will participate in the >> discussion. >> >> Remember that working group consensus to adopt the work needs responses, not >> just absence of objection, so speak up. >> >> --Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
