I would like to come back to a solution that was discussed already: If the route-server is not able to perform the origin prefix validation the BGP community is not added to the BGP update. The BGP community is only added if the origin prefix validation could be executed.
This solution allows a clear signalling. This would also be compatible with the current ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling document and could be easily stated in draft-kklf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light. Best regards, Thomas On 26/04/2016, 13:32, "Matthias Waehlisch" <m.waehli...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: >There was a quite similar discussion in 2013, for the thread see > >https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/zvSP_-iiEfu_acYInK5lOMnys5U > >As far as I remember w/o a final conclusion (or the conclusion was >leave it as is). > > >Cheers > matthias > >On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Thomas King wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Following up on the discussion we had during the last IETF meeting I would >> like to discuss with you how we proceed with the “Did not perform >> validation” value. I think this value is very important and should be added >> to ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling. >> >> Best regards, >> Thomas >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> sidr@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >> > > >-- >Dr. Matthias Waehlisch >. Freie Universitaet Berlin, Inst. fuer Informatik, AG CST >. Takustr. 9, D-14195 Berlin, Germany >.. mailto:m.waehli...@fu-berlin.de .. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl >:. Also: http://inet.haw-hamburg.de .. http://www.link-lab.net _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
