It is a short document. The sentences are not complicated. It reads quickly.
There’s been little/no wg comment on this, certainly no controversy, over the lifetime of the draft. But still. Please. Pretty please. Pretty please with sugar on top. Pretty please with a cherry on top. Could we get some feedback that this document is ready for publication? —Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs On Jun 8, 2016, at 10:19 PM, Sandra Murphy <sa...@tislabs.com> wrote: > No responses at all. > > Come on folks. It’s a short document, like Chris says. > > You should be able to read and comment without much trouble. > > —Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs > > On Jun 1, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Chris Morrow <morr...@ops-netman.net> wrote: > >> >> Howdy WG folks, >> Please take this note as the start of the 2wk WGLC period for: >> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-07> >> >> Abstract: >> "Deployment of the BGPsec architecture and protocols has many >> operational considerations. This document attempts to collect and >> present the most critical and universal. It is expected to evolve as >> BGPsec is formalized and initially deployed." >> >> This is a relatively short document, 8 pages, full of wonder and >> excitement! I hope that the wg members have read it (it's been through >> 8+ revisions) and that they will re-read it quickly, provide comments >> as appropriate and ideas on preparedness for publication or not. >> >> >> Thanks for you time and attention to this matter, >> >> -Chris >> co-chair-persona >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> sidr@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
