Geoff, Thanks for reviewing the text.
I modified the text to change "current VRS-IP" to be "... the value of the VRS-IP computed for certificate x-1" as per your suggestion. I also made this change for the corresponding VRS-AS text.
I don't think we need to add a note about validation being performed "top down" since bullet B already says: "certificate '1' is a trust anchor"
Steve
FWIW, I like this formulation Steve. Possibly when you refer to "the current value of the VRS-IP” you may want to explicitly refer to the VRS-IP of certificate x-1 rather than “current”. I also wonder if it is worth noting that the enumerated steps outlined here are intended to be performed “top down” - i.e. from a trust anchor to the certificate to be validated. regards, Geoff
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
