Speaking as an RP software developer, I think this document is ready for the next step.
My team is working to make RPSTIR support this algorithm. Di > 在 2016年10月20日，22:18，Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> 写道： > > Howdy WG Folks! > > Have we read this document and do we have opinions on it's intended > status/direction/content/the-moon? > > Thanks! (5 days til timers go off) > > -chris > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Chris Morrow <morr...@ops-netman.net> wrote: > Howdy WG folks! > The authors of: > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered > > believe they have addressed all inflight concerns/comments, the > request is to WGLC this, consider it's place in the world and if > appropriate pass this document along to the IESG for publication. > > The abstract for this draft is: > "This document proposes an update to the certificate validation > procedure specified in RFC 6487 that reduces aspects of operational > fragility in the management of certificates in the RPKI, while > retaining essential security features." > > Let's have a read through, consider and reply with your thoughts please, > this WGLC is set to expire: 10/25/2016 - October 25, 2016. > > thanks for reading/replying/thinking! > -chris > co-chair-persona > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
