Yes, just wanted to make sure implementors have the information they need to make a decision.
The text cited from the shepherd write-up only says that RFC6090 predates the patent filing; without a judgement or validity check. However, that was just a thought/question. If the answer is no that’s fine. Mirja > Am 12.12.2016 um 19:12 schrieb Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com>: > >> It's the implementors problem to consider IPR issues even without a >> disclosure. > > and ours not to lead them into ipr with no warning. > > randy > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
