Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - abstract: would it be better to replace "agreeable secure means" here with "agreeable means that provides acceptable data integrity and authentication" ? Just a suggestion. - all examples: the xmlns attribute value gets me a 404. (I mean for "http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/";) While that's ok since we don't want folks to de-reference that at run-time, it might be better if it returned the schema or something useful. And would https be even better there? (Not sure, been a while since I've xml'd;-) - examples would be better with Figure numbers and brief captions. - 5.2.1: Do we really want references to mathematical deities in examples? Real keys would be better, but that said, I do like the whimsical content of those I decoded;-) - As it happens I disagree with Alissa's discuss. This seems clear enough to me, same as any sneakernet protocol. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
