Hi! I was going to wait for the author, but he has been out sick this week… ☹
Picking up from Benoit’s comment – the use of “protocol” is misleading. What is described is a process that can be followed and the necessary information exchanged “to simplify configuration…by setting up relationships and exchanging keying material used to authenticate those relationships.” Thanks! Alvaro. On 1/17/17, 1:00 PM, "Alissa Cooper" <ali...@cooperw.in<mailto:ali...@cooperw.in>> wrote: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) I agree with Mirja that this document seems to be missing the actual protocol specification, unless Section 6 is meant to provide the normative specification of how the messages are to be exchanged. Is it? If so, I would expect that to be explicit in the document. (2) If there is in fact supposed to be a protocol specified here, I have the same question as I had on draft-ietf-sidr-publication, which is how do the entities migrate from one version to another and do version negotiation?
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
