On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Rob Austein <s...@hactrn.net> wrote:
> At Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:40:00 -0800, Alia Atlas wrote: > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This looks like it obsoletes RFC6810 or perhaps updates it. > > The draft header should show this so RFC meta-data is accurate. > > The authors had a loooonng discussion about this with our AD. > We will do whatever he tells us to do here. :) > I am not at all surprised - and that is why this is a Comment and not a Discuss. IMHO, a new implementor would want to be pointed to the most recent version of the protocol. That indicates to me that an Updates is the minimum. Then, well, I'd have to dig to see what we've done with protocol RFCs when we advance the version number. Obviously, OSPF is not a good example here :-) Regards, Alia
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
