At Sat, 04 Mar 2017 13:05:11 +0900, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > > > Section 2, 3rd paragraph: > > > > "Similarly on the receiving IBGP speakers, the validation > > state of an IBGP route SHOULD be derived directly from the last octet > > of the extended community, if present." > > > > to: > > "Similarly on the receiving IBGP speakers, the validation state of > > an IBGP route SHOULD be derived directly from the last octet of the > > extended community, if present. A receiving router should use > > locally achieved validation state before trusting an IBGP neighbors > > state information." > > sure. or, tersified, > > "Similarly, a receiving IBGP speaker, in the absence of validation > state set based on local data, SHOULD derive a validations state from > the last octet of the extended community, if present."
great! _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
