At Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:25:27 -0500, Rob Austein <s...@hactrn.net> wrote: > > At Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:44:58 +0000, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote: > > > > I just finished reading this document. My review is predicated on > > the assumption that the intent of the WG is to define an additional > > validation process, and not amend/change/update/deprecate the > > existing one?yet, which is why there are not only process changes > > specified, but also new OIDs. > > Alvaro, > > I will let the WG chairs and authors speak to intent regarding the > existing validation process. >
I think the intent of the WG is still to add the new validation process, then deprecate the original once all users are on code which supports the 'new' way. -chris _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
