On 6/22/17, 10:36 AM, "Tim Bruijnzeels" <t...@ripe.net> wrote:
Tim: Hi! > All that said I will work on an update of this document following > Alvaro’s review. This document will define an additional validation > algorithm, but not update the existing one. We can finish this work > first and then have a structured discussion about deployment - I > propose that we take this work to SIDROPS. I’m assuming that you mean: finish draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered in sidr (i.e. publish as an RFC) and then further discuss deployment in sidrops, right? > I canceled all my meetings today so I should have updated text to > share with my co-authors soon. Will then send a new version to > the WG asap. Just a procedure note: Even though there should be a good number of changes, I don’t think we need to run the result through the WG (as in a new WGLC). I’m happy to allow time for anyone to comment further, either now or during IETF LC. I just rather not officially send the document back to the WG. Thanks! Alvaro. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
