The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC6480, "An Infrastructure to Support Secure Internet Routing".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5196 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Technical Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmal...@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2017-12-05 Held by: Alvaro Retana (IESG) Section: 6 Original Text ------------- 3. For each manifest, verify that certificates and CRLs issued under the corresponding CA certificate match the hash values contained in the manifest. Additionally, verify that no certificate or manifest listed on the manifest is missing from the repository. If the hash values do not match, or if any certificate or CRL is missing, notify the appropriate repository administrator that the repository data has been corrupted. Corrected Text -------------- 3. For each manifest, verify that certificates and CRLs issued under the corresponding CA certificate match the hash values contained in the manifest. Additionally, verify that no certificate or CRL listed on the manifest is missing from the repository. If the hash values do not match, or if any certificate or CRL is missing, notify the appropriate repository administrator that the repository data has been corrupted. Notes ----- On the fourth line: it should read "certificate or CRL" instead of "certificate or manifest". -------------------------------------- RFC6480 (draft-ietf-sidr-arch-13) -------------------------------------- Title : An Infrastructure to Support Secure Internet Routing Publication Date : February 2012 Author(s) : M. Lepinski, S. Kent Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Secure Inter-Domain Routing Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
