Ignas Bagdonas has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-slurm/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A few comments: 1. Document uses all capital form of AND for filters containing both prefixes and ASNs, and filters containing ASNs and SKIs. That is not part of RFC2119 language. 2. s/Route Origination Authorization/Route Origin Authorization 3. If a local assertion is added without a matching filter, does it take priority over existing assertion? 4. The term 'putative TA' has been flagged a couple of times in various reviews as being not known. It does not appear to be formally defined, RFC7730 seems to be the closest source - while it is not formally defined there either. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
