Dear Eduardo,
thank you for your suggestion. I would like to do that, but I cannot find the scalapack provided by siesta. Is it an extra package that I have to download from the website?

Simon

Eduardo Anglada wrote:

Dear Simon,
There is a problem with digital scalapack, use the one provided by siesta
Regards,
Eduardo


On 06/03/2007, at 11:48, Simon Dubois wrote:

Dear Siesta Users,

previously, I used a version of siesta.2.0.1 compiled in parallel with pgi on AMD processors, and it went fine. Now, I'm trying to use the same version of siesta in parallel on Alpha processors. The compilation goes well but, when running in parallel, the code produces a lot of comments that I'm not used to see...

.......
{ 0, 0}: On entry to PZHEGVX parameter number 2 had an illegal value { 0, 1}: On entry to PZHEGVX parameter number 2 had an illegal value { 0, 1}: On entry to PZHEGVX parameter number 2 had an illegal value { 0, 0}: On entry to PZHEGVX parameter number 2 had an illegal value { 0, 1}: On entry to PZHEGVX parameter number 2 had an illegal value { 0, 0}: On entry to PZHEGVX parameter number 2 had an illegal value { 0, 1}: On entry to PZHEGVX parameter number 2 had an illegal value
.......

Is there sombody who have already experimented these comments?
Any advice will be appreciated....

Simon





Reply via email to