Hi,

In fact, I just used the small system as a test. In my calculation, I used a 
cell with more than 70 atoms including metal atoms and other nonmetal elements,
If I just caluclate whiel regarding the system as one molecule, it works, but 
when I imposed a periodic condition to it in one direction, it didn't work. And 
I got the following
prompt,
wgthopt(maxkopt): maxkopt is too large, cannot be handled.

I already checked the source codes, I also have the feeling that maxkopt is too 
large.
By the way, the workstation I used has 2G memory.

Do you have any good suggestion?

Regards,
David, XIAO

-----Original Message-----
From: Siesta, Self-Consistent DFT LCAO program, http://www.uam.es/siesta 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrei Postnikov
Sent: 星期二, 4 一月, 2005 PM 11:16
To: SIESTA-L@LISTSERV.UAM.ES
Subject: Re: [SIESTA-L] One problem of using OrderN mothod.


Hi,

it seems that OrderN works only for non-magnetic AND insulating systems,
i.e. you must have
i) an even total number of electrons (of course; as the simplest test
that you are not trying to run a magnetic system), but also
ii) your system must indeed be non-magnetic and
iii) have a good band gap.

Does your metal chain fulfil all these conditions?
And:
Do you really need OrderN for so small system?

Best regards,

Andrei Postnikov

+-- Dr. habil. Andrei Postnikov ----- Tel. +49-541-969.2377 -- Fax .2351 ---+
| Universitaet Osnabrueck - Fachbereich Physik, D-49069 Osnabrueck, Germany |
+-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------- http://www.home.uni-osnabrueck.de/apostnik/ --+

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Xiao Changyong wrote:

| Hi, all,
|
| When I chose the method OrderN to calculate a small system, single-cell
| formed a metal wire, however, I got the following prompt:
|
| Ordern: enum=   99.000
|  cspa: ERROR: Wrong total charge; odd charge: 0.0000E+000
|           ERROR: Charge must be EVEN to use Order-N option.
|
|
| In my calculation, a single-cell has 9 atoms, and each atom has 11
| valence electrons.
| So that it means I must design a system with even number of electron. Am
| I right?
| If it is true, I must use a multi-cell for my case.
|
| I am looking forward to hearing from you.
|
| Regards,
| David, Changyong XIAO
|

Reply via email to