Ok... I hadn't paid attention to your DM.MixingWeight. Your particle has
quite a few atoms... If your DM.MixingWeight is too large, it will never
converge properly. Or, maybe it will, but you'll wait a lifetime... Try
setting DM.MixingWeight to something like 0.05 or even lower. One more
thing, to speed things up: vacuum comes practically for free in Siesta, as
opposed to plane-waves. Since you have a cluster (a big molecule,
essentially), you don't need to use kgrid_cutoff. Increase the size of your
cell so that the minimum separation between images is large enough and do a
gamma-point only calculation. And, for a good calculation, DM.Tolerance
should be set to the default value or lower still.

Marcos

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:19 PM, mahshid hezary <he_mahs...@yahoo.com>wrote:

> Dear Marcos,
>
> > Two things. First, quite basic: what do you mean by "does not converge"?
> Can you give >more detail on that?
>
> I mean  that after 500 iterations there is a fluctuation in fermi energy
> and therfore the difference between the DM elements dose not converge even
> for DM.Tolerance   about 0.001.
>
>
> >Try increasing your cutoff to something between 200-300 Ry and see if scf
> convergence >improves. It will be slower, but if convergence is better,
> it'll be worth it.
>
> If you mean MeshCutOff energy, I have incresed it to 350 Ry, again no
> convergence!?
>
> Regards,
> Mahshid
> --- On *Wed, 4/21/10, Marcos Veríssimo Alves <
> marcos.verissimo.al...@gmail.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Marcos Veríssimo Alves <marcos.verissimo.al...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [SIESTA-L] why SCF does not converge in nanoparticle?
> To: siesta-l@uam.es
> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 5:22 PM
>
>
> Mahshid,
>
> Two things. First, quite basic: what do you mean by "does not converge"?
> Can you give more detail on that?
>
> Second, for you to try. Oxygen is an element with a pseudo that can be
> quite hard. I am not sure what a good cutoff would be for O, but I'd guess
> 150 would be the bare minimum. Try increasing your cutoff to something
> between 200-300 Ry and see if scf convergence improves. It will be slower,
> but if convergence is better, it'll be worth it.
>
> Marcos
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:46 PM, mahshid hezary 
> <he_mahs...@yahoo.com<http://us.mc572.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=he_mahs...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
>
>>   Hi Dear User
>> I want to calculate nanoparticle properties of ZnO with siesta. but SCF
>> does not converge.for more discription my fdf is below.
>> why SCF does not converge?
>> Best Regards.
>> Mahshid
>>
>>
>> SystemLabel      ZnO
>> NumberOfAtoms    72
>> NumberOfSpecies  2
>>
>> %block ChemicalSpeciesLabel
>>     1   30  Zn
>>     2    8  O
>> %endblock ChemicalSpeciesLabel
>>
>> AtomicCoordinatesFormat  Ang
>> LatticeConstant 1.0 Ang
>>
>> %block LatticeVectors
>>    31.3564842311  -18.1036746116    0.0000000000
>>     0.0000000000   32.9578494821    0.0000000000
>>     0.0000000000    0.0000000000   42.0795501907
>> %endblock LatticeVectors
>>
>>
>> %block AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies
>>        0.9380499213     1.6247499145     0.0000000000   1
>>        3.7521990571     0.0000001529     0.0000000000   1
>>        6.5663485067    -1.6247497890     0.0000000000   1
>>        0.9380499213     4.8742495179     0.0000000000   1
>>        3.7521990571     3.2494997564     0.0000000000   1
>>        6.5663485067     1.6247498144     0.0000000000   1
>>        0.9380499213     1.6247499145     5.2068999762   1
>>        3.7521990571     0.0000001529     5.2068999762   1
>>        6.5663485067    -1.6247497890     5.2068999762   1
>>        0.9380499213     4.8742495179     5.2068999762   1
>>        3.7521990571     3.2494997564     5.2068999762   1
>>        6.5663485067     1.6247498144     5.2068999762   1
>>        0.9380499213     1.6247499145    10.4137999520   1
>>        3.7521990571     0.0000001529    10.4137999520   1
>>        6.5663485067    -1.6247497890    10.4137999520   1
>>        0.9380499213     4.8742495179    10.4137999520   1
>>        3.7521990571     3.2494997564    10.4137999520   1
>>        6.5663485067     1.6247498144    10.4137999520   1
>>        1.8760995283     0.0000000767     2.6034499879   1
>>        4.6902489779    -1.6247498658     2.6034499879   1
>>        7.5043981142    -3.2494996268     2.6034499879   1
>>        1.8760995283     3.2494996802     2.6034499879   1
>>        4.6902489779     1.6247497377     2.6034499879   1
>>        7.5043981142    -0.0000000233     2.6034499879   1
>>        1.8760995283     0.0000000767     7.8103499641   1
>>        4.6902489779    -1.6247498658     7.8103499641   1
>>        7.5043981142    -3.2494996268     7.8103499641   1
>>        1.8760995283     3.2494996802     7.8103499641   1
>>        4.6902489779     1.6247497377     7.8103499641   1
>>        7.5043981142    -0.0000000233     7.8103499641   1
>>        1.8760995283     0.0000000767    13.0172503611   1
>>        4.6902489779    -1.6247498658    13.0172503611   1
>>        7.5043981142    -3.2494996268    13.0172503611   1
>>        1.8760995283     3.2494996802    13.0172503611   1
>>        4.6902489779     1.6247497377    13.0172503611   1
>>        7.5043981142    -0.0000000233    13.0172503611   1
>>        0.9380499213     1.6247499145     1.9786221088   2
>>        3.7521990571     0.0000001529     1.9786221088   2
>>        6.5663485067    -1.6247497890     1.9786221088   2
>>        0.9380499213     4.8742495179     1.9786221088   2
>>        3.7521990571     3.2494997564     1.9786221088   2
>>        6.5663485067     1.6247498144     1.9786221088   2
>>        0.9380499213     1.6247499145     7.1855220845   2
>>        3.7521990571     0.0000001529     7.1855220845   2
>>        6.5663485067    -1.6247497890     7.1855220845   2
>>        0.9380499213     4.8742495179     7.1855220845   2
>>        3.7521990571     3.2494997564     7.1855220845   2
>>        6.5663485067     1.6247498144     7.1855220845   2
>>        0.9380499213     1.6247499145    12.3924220608   2
>>        3.7521990571     0.0000001529    12.3924220608   2
>>        6.5663485067    -1.6247497890    12.3924220608   2
>>        0.9380499213     4.8742495179    12.3924220608   2
>>        3.7521990571     3.2494997564    12.3924220608   2
>>        6.5663485067     1.6247498144    12.3924220608   2
>>        1.8760995283     0.0000000767     4.5820720967   2
>>        4.6902489779    -1.6247498658     4.5820720967   2
>>        7.5043981142    -3.2494996268     4.5820720967   2
>>        1.8760995283     3.2494996802     4.5820720967   2
>>        4.6902489779     1.6247497377     4.5820720967   2
>>        7.5043981142    -0.0000000233     4.5820720967   2
>>        1.8760995283     0.0000000767     9.7889720729   2
>>        4.6902489779    -1.6247498658     9.7889720729   2
>>        7.5043981142    -3.2494996268     9.7889720729   2
>>        1.8760995283     3.2494996802     9.7889720729   2
>>        4.6902489779     1.6247497377     9.7889720729   2
>>        7.5043981142    -0.0000000233     9.7889720729   2
>>        1.8760995283     0.0000000767    14.9958720487   2
>>        4.6902489779    -1.6247498658    14.9958720487   2
>>        7.5043981142    -3.2494996268    14.9958720487   2
>>        1.8760995283     3.2494996802    14.9958720487   2
>>        4.6902489779     1.6247497377    14.9958720487   2
>>        7.5043981142    -0.0000000233    14.9958720487   2
>> %endblock AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies
>>
>> MeshCutoff           150 Ry
>> Kgrid_Cutoff         10. Ang
>> PAO.BasisSize        DZP
>>
>> MaxSCFIterations      500
>> DM.Tolerance          0.1000000000E-02
>> DM.NumberPulay        8
>> DM.MixingWeight       0.3
>> XC.authors            PBE
>> XC.functional         GGA
>> ElectronicTemperature  30.0 meV
>> SolutionMethod        diagon        # OrderN or Diagon
>>
>> LongOutput            .true.
>> MD.UseSaveXV          .true.
>> SaveRho               .true.
>>
>> WriteEigenvalues      .true.
>>
>> %block ProjectedDensityOfStates
>>    -30.00 30.00 0.020 500 eV
>> %endblock ProjectedDensityOfStates
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Responder a