As you said, convergence tests is the way to go.

2015-07-03 9:06 GMT+02:00 Nadia Salami <nadiasala...@gmail.com>:

> Dear Dr. Papior,
>
> Thank you very much for your reply.
> I have applied these options,
>
> TS.BiasContour.Eta  0.00000001   Ry
> TS.BiasContour.NumPoints  10
>
> But I don't know how to obtain the optimized value.
>
> Your Guidance will be highly appreciated.
> Thanks a lot.
> Best,
> Nadia Salami
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Nick Papior <nickpap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Please read the documentation for transiesta.
>>
>> In the currently released versions these keywords should peak your
>> interest:
>> TS.BiasContour.Eta
>> TS.BiasContour.NumPoints
>>
>>
>> 2015-07-03 5:33 GMT+02:00 Nadia Salami <nadiasala...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Dear Transiesta users,
>>>
>>> According to DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.165401, I know that the
>>> non-equilibrium part of density matrix must be evaluated for a finite level
>>> broadening and on a fine grid. I need to do convergence test in the level
>>> broadening and number of grid points. But I don't know how to do the
>>> convergence test?
>>>
>>> Any comments and guidance will be appreciated.
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Nadia Salami
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kind regards Nick
>>
>
>


-- 
Kind regards Nick

Responder a