Dear Nick,

I am very grateful for your help. I will follow the tips.

Leone Carmo Garcia

2015-08-18 16:42 GMT-03:00 Nick Papior <[email protected]>:

>
>
> 2015-08-18 19:27 GMT+00:00 leoqmc . <[email protected]>:
>
>> Dear Nick and transiesta users,
>>
>> I am interested in transport calculations in single-molecule two-probe
>> systems[Au(111)-Molecule-Au(111)]. I searched in the list for the following
>> questions, but I think that these questions were not explicitly solved for
>> a beginner. Please help me.
>>
>> 1) Charge: The Molecule is charged(charge +2). Not make sense uses the
>> option (NetCharge 2.0) in the transiesta calculation, since that the charge
>> will be screened. I'm right?
>>
> No that will most likely not work, currently this is not an easy task.
>
>>
>> 2) Setup for the electrodes:
>>     a) The third lattice's vector (z-direction) should have length
>> minimal possible, namely it should be enough for the atoms+basis functions.
>> I'm right?
>>
> In your case, make the z-direction periodic.
>
>>     b) The lattice's vectors in x,y direction should include large vacuum
>> (~20 Angstroms). I'm right?
>>
> No, not necessarily, here you can also impose periodicity. Please look at
> the examples in the test directory, an example of gold, gold-chain, gold is
> shown. That could be the basis for your further geometry creation. See
> example ts_au_100, both the repetition and non-repeated structure.
>
>>     c) Usually you use how many units ("N") of the electrodes (N * ABC)?
>>
> In your 111 direction I would think a single ABC stacking should be
> enough. This depends on your basis range, you need to check this your-self.
>
>>
>> 3) Setup for complete device (Electrodes + Molecule):
>>
>>     a) My electrodes are equal. In this case it is mandatory to include
>> vacuum in the z direction, such that the device is not affected by their
>> image in the calculation of siesta prior to the calculation of transiesta?
>>
> Please re-read 2a. If electrodes are the same, having a periodic setup is
> far better than the alternative. Again refer to the example as suggested in
> 2b.
>
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Leone Carmo Garcia
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Kind regards Nick
>

Responder a