2016-04-27 15:04 GMT+02:00 arash ghafary <[email protected]>: > Dear Nick, > I set > TS.Voltage 0.5 eV > but .VH file containts Poential(0) > and by changing TS.Voltage .VH file not changes. > They do indeed look like they are the same, but they are not. Please do the exercise I wrote. If the difference indeed is zero, then return with questions.
> best > arash, > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Nick Papior <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> 2016-04-27 14:45 GMT+02:00 arash ghafary <[email protected]>: >> >>> Thanks Nick, >>> but I can not get potential(V). >>> >> You already have it. >> >> 1. calculation >> TS.Voltage 0 eV >> the .VH file contains "Potential(0)" >> 2. calculation >> TS.Voltage 0.5 eV >> the .VH file contains "Potential(0.5 V)" >> >> >> >>> >>> best >>> Arash, >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Nick Papior <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> You need to do: >>>> >>>> Potential(V) - Potential(0) >>>> >>>> to get the potential drop of the device (I suspect this is what you >>>> request?). >>>> >>>> 2016-04-27 14:12 GMT+02:00 arash ghafary <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Dear Transiesta users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> How can I get electrostatic potential under finite bias voltage? >>>>> >>>>> I use >>>>> >>>>> SaveElectrostaicPotential T >>>>> >>>>> with different >>>>> >>>>> TS.Voltage 0.1 (0.2,0.3,...) eV >>>>> >>>>> then use macroave program to convert .VH file to .macroave file, but >>>>> answers are similar to 0 volt bias. >>>>> >>>>> what is wrong? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best wishes, >>>>> >>>>> Arash, >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Kind regards Nick >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Kind regards Nick >> > > -- Kind regards Nick
