Take a look at the following paper. They discus the effect of various
methods in the determinations of water atomic charges:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcc.20157/full

F. Martin, H. Zipse, Charge distribution in the water molecule. A
comparison of methods,
J. Comput. Chem. 26 (2005) 97-105.
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20157



[]'s,

Camps

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:44 AM, Ulrich Biedermann <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Dear Dan,
> I have noticed similar problems.  Mulliken charges depend on the atomic
> basis set used.  In Siesta the cutoff radius (of H) seems to be the
> critical parameter.  I suggest that you check the dipol moment of an
> isolated water molecule (10 Angstrom box).  It should have the correct
> magnitude and sign for the basis set settings you use.
>
> Regards, Ulrich.
>
> * From: * Dan Gil <[email protected]>
> * To: * <[email protected]>
> * Sent: * 06.10.2017 16:13
> * Subject: * [SIESTA-L] Mulliken Charges on Water
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using Siesta 3.2 and ran into a strange problem.
>
> I simulate a water molecule and the Mulliken charges are wrong. It shows
> that the oxygen atom is positively charged and the two hydrogens are
> negatively charged. The Hirshfeld and Voronoi populations are fine. Did I
> run into a bug?
>
> *input.fdf*
> NumberOfAtoms       3
> NumberOfSpecies     4
>
> %block ChemicalSpeciesLabel
>  1  13 Al
>  2  14 Si
>  3   8 O
>  4   1 H
> %endblock ChemicalSpeciesLabel
>
> PAO.BasisType     nodes
>
> %block PAO.BasisSizes
> Al DZP
> Si DZP
> O  DZP
> H  DZP
> %endblock PAO.BasisSizes
>
> XC.functional GGA
> XC.authors    PBE
>
> # SCF options
> MaxSCFIterations      200
> DM.MixingWeight       0.25         # New DM amount for next SCF cycle
> DM.Tolerance          1.d-6         # Tolerance in maximum difference
> SolutionMethod        diagon        # OrderN or Diagon
> MeshCutoff  400 Ry
> DM.Require.Energy.Convergence    .true.
> DM.Energy.Tolerance              1.d-6 eV
>
> MD.TypeOfRun          CG
> MD.NumCGsteps         100
> MD.InitialTemperature 300.0 K
> MD.TargetTemperature  300.0 K
>
> WriteHirshfeldPop .true.
> WriteVoronoiPop     .true.
> WriteMullikenPop    1
>
> LatticeConstant 1   Ang
>
> %block LatticeVectors
>  9.5160000000  0.0000000000  0.0000000000
> -4.7580000000  8.2411000000  0.0000000000
>  0.0000000000  0.0000000000 48.2792733630
> %endblock LatticeVectors
>
> WarningMinimumAtiomicDistance 1.0 Ang
> AtomicCoordinatesFormat  NotScaledCartesianAng
> %block AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies < Coord.fdf
>
> *Coord.fdf*
> 5.265981 -1.943725 -6.378528 3
> 4.222545 -1.943725 -6.378528 4
> 5.612381 -0.997652 -6.378528 4
>
> *Output (excerpts)*
> mulliken: Mulliken Atomic and Orbital Populations:
> Species: O
> Atom  Qatom  Qorb
>                2s      2s      2py     2pz     2px     2py     2pz
>  2px
>                2Pdxy   2Pdyz   2Pdz2   2Pdxz   2Pdx2-y2
>    1  5.764   1.436  -0.027   1.363   1.793   1.235  -0.023  -0.003  -0.034
>               0.003   0.002   0.005   0.001   0.014
>
> Species: H
> Atom  Qatom  Qorb
>                1s      1s      1Ppy    1Ppz    1Ppx
>    2  1.118   0.845   0.036   0.063   0.104   0.070
>    3  1.118   0.845   0.036   0.091   0.104   0.042
>
> Hirshfeld Net Atomic Populations:
> Atom #    Qatom  Species
>      1   -0.234  O
>      2    0.117  H
>      3    0.117  H
>
> Voronoi Net Atomic Populations:
> Atom #    Qatom  Species
>      1   -0.171  O
>      2    0.086  H
>      3    0.085  H
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------
> Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH
> Max-Planck-Straße
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Max-Planck-Stra%C3%9Fe%C2%A01&entry=gmail&source=g>
>  1
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Max-Planck-Stra%C3%9Fe%C2%A01&entry=gmail&source=g>
> D-40237 Düsseldorf
>
> Handelsregister B 2533
> Amtsgericht Düsseldorf
>
> Geschäftsführung
> Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dehm
> Prof. Dr. Jörg Neugebauer
> Prof. Dr. Dierk Raabe
> Dr. Kai de Weldige
>
> Ust.-Id.-Nr.: DE 11 93 58 514
> Steuernummer: 105 5891 1000
>
>
> Please consider that invitations and e-mails of our institute are
> only valid if they end with …@mpie.de.
> If you are not sure of the validity please contact [email protected]
>
> Bitte beachten Sie, dass Einladungen zu Veranstaltungen und E-Mails
> aus unserem Haus nur mit der Endung …@mpie.de gültig sind.
> In Zweifelsfällen wenden Sie sich bitte an [email protected]
> -------------------------------------------------
>

Responder a