Dear users,

I run a large job with perfect orbital distribution over processors
(exactly 20 orbitals per processor).


As you can see in the data appended below, it takes approximately 25
seconds between SCF steps in the Gamma point run.


For 2 k-points however, it takes approximately 125 seconds between SCF
cycles (see below), which is 5 times the Gamma point time.


This is confusing me because a 2 k-point job is technically 2 successive
Gamma point jobs, so I was expecting the time between SCF steps to be
around twice that of the Gamma point job. 5 times is way too high and I was
wondering if there's anything I can do to circumvent this problem.


Thanks!


Gamma point

Start of run             0.000

-------------- end of scf step            36.845

-------------- end of scf step            64.071

-------------- end of scf step            89.467

-------------- end of scf step           115.114

-------------- end of scf step           140.442

-------------- end of scf step           169.311

-------------- end of scf step           197.407

-------------- end of scf step           222.953

-------------- end of scf step           248.311

-------------- end of scf step           273.939

-------------- end of scf step           299.205

-------------- end of scf step           325.194

-------------- end of scf step           350.430

-------------- end of scf step           376.049

-------------- end of scf step           401.498

-------------- end of scf step           427.002



2 k-points

Start of run             0.000

-------------- end of scf step           137.140

-------------- end of scf step           263.171

-------------- end of scf step           388.183

-------------- end of scf step           516.512

-------------- end of scf step           641.262

-------------- end of scf step           765.025

-------------- end of scf step           891.643

-------------- end of scf step          1016.512

-------------- end of scf step          1140.165

-------------- end of scf step          1264.910

-------------- end of scf step          1388.616

-------------- end of scf step          1512.917

-------------- end of scf step          1637.145

-------------- end of scf step          1761.197

-------------- end of scf step          1885.839

-------------- end of scf step          2009.728
-- 
SIESTA is supported by the Spanish Research Agency (AEI) and by the European 
H2020 MaX Centre of Excellence (http://www.max-centre.eu/)

Responder a