Changing or removing the rules is not the way to address people submitting invalid or misleading information.
Also I doubt that the hostmasters would be 'aware' of a case. If they were then the question would be why did they approve the resource application. On Wednesday, 4 February 2015, Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dean, > Thanks for raising the question. > > Could I ask that the APNIC hostmasters to comment on the following: >> >> Have you ever been made aware of a situation where due of the current >> wording of the relevant clauses in the policy, a member or potential member >> has not made a resource application where they would otherwise have been >> able to? >> > > Would like to add something here to the question, "have you even been made > aware of a situation where applicant provided wrong or fake multi-homing > information just to meet the criteria?" > > >> In other words has the current policy in the eyes of the host masters >> ever been a barrier to entry? >> >> Very valid point. > > > Regards, > > Aftab A. Siddiqui > > > -- -- Dean Pemberton Technical Policy Advisor InternetNZ +64 21 920 363 (mob) d...@internetnz.net.nz To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
