-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I support this.

- -gaurab


On 3/5/15 4:50 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> In this text, the suggested guidelines have been removed to be
> replaced with:
> 
> " - you have been previous allocated provider independent address 
> space by APNIC AND
> 
> 
> - intend to multi-home in the future
> 
> "
> 
> 
> This policy can be reviewed on an annual basis for any impact on
> the number of allocations of ASN and if there has been any
> detrimental effect.
> 
> 
> ======
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> prop-114-v003: Modification in the ASN eligibility criteria
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Proposer:      Aftab Siddiqui
> 
> aftab.siddi...@gmail.com <mailto:aftab.siddi...@gmail.com>
> 
> 
> Skeeve Stevens
> 
> ske...@eintellegonetworks.com 
> <mailto:ske...@eintellegonetworks.com>
> 
> 
> 
> 1. Problem statement
> 
> --------------------
> 
> 
> The current ASN assignment policy states two eligibility criteria
> and that both criteria should be fulfilled in order to obtain an
> ASN. The policy seems to imply that both requirements i.e.
> multi-homing and clearly defined single routing policy must be met
> simultaneously, this has created much confusion in interpreting the
> policy.
> 
> 
> As a result organizations have either provided incorrect
> information to get the ASN or barred themselves from applying where
> they still have a valid justification for obtaining an ASN.
> 
> 
> 
> 2. Objective of policy change
> 
> -----------------------------
> 
> 
> In order to make the policy guidelines simpler we are proposing to 
> modify the text describing the eligibility criteria for ASN
> assignment by providing alternate criteria to obtaining an ASN.
> 
> 
> 
> 3. Situation in other regions
> 
> -----------------------------
> 
> 
> ARIN:
> 
> It is not mandatory but optional to be multi-homed in order get
> ASN
> 
> 
> RIPE:
> 
> Policy to remove multi-homing requirement is currently in
> discussion and the current phase ends 12 February 2015 (awaiting
> Chair decision)
> 
> Policy - https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-03
> 
> 
> LACNIC:
> 
> Only inter-connect is mandatory not multi-homing
> 
> 
> AFRINIC:
> 
> It is mandatory to be multi-homed in order to get ASN.
> 
> 
> 
> 4. Proposed policy solution
> 
> ---------------------------
> 
> 
> An organisation is eligible for an ASN assignment if:
> 
> 
> - they are currently multi-homed OR
> 
> 
> - you have been previous allocated provider independent address 
> space by APNIC AND
> 
> 
> - intend to multi-home in the future
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 5. Advantages / Disadvantages
> 
> -----------------------------
> 
> 
> Advantages:
> 
> 
> By adding the additional criteria of Guidelines managed by APNIC 
> Secretariat, this would enable the Secretariat to make decisions
> based on common or rare use cases, but that may still be a valid
> request.
> 
> 
> Disadvantages:
> 
> 
> It may be perceived that this policy would enable members to
> obtain ASN’s more easily, and in return cause faster consumption of
> ASN’s in the region.  Given the relative ease of obtaining an ASN
> with ‘work around’ methods, we do not perceive this will actually
> have any effect.
> 
> 
> 
> 6. Impact on resource holders
> 
> -----------------------------
> 
> 
> No impact on existing resource holders.
> 
> 
> 
> 7. References
> 
> -------------
> 
> 
> 
> ======
> 
> ...Skeeve
> 
> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* *v4Now - *an eintellego
> Networks service ske...@v4now.com <mailto:ske...@v4now.com> ;
> www.v4now.com <http://www.v4now.com/>
> 
> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
> 
> facebook.com/v4now <http://facebook.com/v4now> ;
> <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>linkedin.com/in/skeeve 
> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve>
> 
> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; blog:
> www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/>
> 
> 
> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers
> 
> 
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> * _______________________________________________ sig-policy
> mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net 
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> 


- -- 

http://www.gaurab.org.np/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAlT36SwACgkQSo7fU26F3X2cuACglPD0tyZJ49oDuOD/Kqedsvcx
FsAAnj1U/+8Jgy8T1VEwrT60krby/puw
=rl5N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to