Thank you very much Aftab and Owen for your constructive feedback. We will definitely consider those views.
If any one has any different perspective please jump in and share your thoughts. Sincerely, Sumon On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 10:52 AM Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > Aftab, I think you misread the proposed language. > > First, neither the current version nor the proposed version refer to > members at all, but to the actions of the APNIC, NIRs, and ISPs. The one > change I think should be made there is to replace ISPs with LIRs since not > all LIRs are technically ISPs, though that is certainly the most common > case. > > As to your “not limited to” or “services related to resources”, I fail to > see how that is not addressed by the proposed “…and related services”. > > I support the language proposed by Sumon whether or not he chooses to take > my NIR suggestion. > > Owen > > > On May 5, 2019, at 03:21 , Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thanks Sumon bhai for the initiative, > > <nitpik> > Revised text suggest that all members/resource holders in APNIC are ISPs > only, I would suggest to make it "APNIC and NIR members or resource holders > in Asia Pacific region". Because not all members are resource holders. > > Secondly, when you start mentioning topics in the charter then it may > create confusion moving forward that only these topics can be covered so > how about adding "not limited to" or "services related to resources" or > something like that. > </nitpik> > > > Regards, > > Aftab A. Siddiqui > > > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 4:31 PM Sumon Ahmed Sabir <sasa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Dear Members, >> >> In the last APNIC meeting in Daejoan there was a discussion that there is >> a perception >> That Policy SIG discusses only about “Address Policy”. On the other hand >> there is a understanding >> that Policy SIG covers a wider range of registry issues, RPKI or any >> other topics that requires a >> procedures and rules. >> >> To avoid confusion and to bring clarity in the Policy Charter few >> proposals came in. That either we can change the Name of the Policy SIG >> to cover wider range or to amend the Policy-SIG Charter to bring clarity >> about the scope of Policy SIG. >> >> After discussions chairs feels that we can make some changes in the SIG >> Charter to bring clarity: >> >> >> Current SIG Charter https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/policy-sig/ >> says: >> >> >> ‘The Policy SIG charter is to develop policies and procedures >> which relate to the management and >> use of Internet address resources by APNIC, NIRs, and ISPs within the >> Asia Pacific region.” >> >> And here is the possible changes proposed: >> >> “The Policy SIG charter is to develop policies which relate to >> the management and use of Internet address resources by APNIC, NIRs, >> and ISPs within the Asia Pacific region. These include policies for >> resource allocation, recovery and transfer, and for resource registration >> within whois, reverse DNS, RPKI and related services.” >> >> Please share your views, comments or suggestions in this regard. >> >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Sumon, Bertrand and Ching-Heng >> Chairs, Policy-SIG >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >> * >> _______________________________________________ >> sig-policy mailing list >> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net >> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
