Hi Jordi and all,

Will respond on Monday as we're currently recuperating from the APRICOT week :) 
Stay tuned.

Sanjaya

Sent from my mobile.

________________________________
From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net <sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net> 
on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2020 1:20:59 PM
To: mailman_SIG-policy <sig-pol...@apnic.net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-133: Clarification on Sub-Assignments

Hi all,

After my previous response to Owen, I can't find anymore any the text in the 
actual policy (neither guidelines)  about assignments. So, I'm wondering if I 
was wrong, or it has been removed at some point and I don't recall it ... Could 
the secretariat point out to the specific text about that? If it has been 
removed, clearly there is a need to further update section 2.2.3 to remove that 
reference and avoid the mismatch.

One more request for the secretariat. Could you please provide stats on the 
number of ISP (not end-users) assignments, for example in the last 12-15 years, 
in order to understand if this is a real requirement?

Anyone can provide examples of why an ISP could need and assignment instead of 
using their own allocation?

Thanks!

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet





**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.



*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to