Dear Members,

I support the views of Chku. In case of M&A cases policy should be simple
enough and APNIC need to act as a facilitator.

Regards,

Rajesh Panwala
For Smartlink Solutions Pvt Ltd


On Tue, Feb 2, 2021, 9:55 AM chku <c...@twnic.tw> wrote:

> Dear SIG members,
>
> A new version of the proposal "prop-130: Modification of transfer policies"
> has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
>
> It will be presented during the Open Policy Meeting at APRICOT2021/APNIC 51
> online-only conference on Wednesday, 03 February 2021.
>
> We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list
> before the meeting.
>
> The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC conference is an
> important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to
> express your views on the proposal:
>
> - Do you support or oppose this proposal?
> - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so,
> tell the community about your situation.
> - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
> - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
> - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
> effective?
>
> Information about this proposal is available at:
> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-130
>
> Regards,
> Bertrand and Ching-Heng
> APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> prop-130-v003: Modification of transfer policies
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Proposer: Jordi Palet Martnez
> jordi.pa...@theipv6company.com
>
>
> 1. Problem statement
> --------------------
>
> Existing transfer policies for IPv4, IPv6 and ASN resources have some
> differences among what is allowed and what not, if in the case of
> intra-RIR and inter-RIR, and it is not clear if in case of merger and
> acquisitions it is referring to a complete company, part of it, or even
> if in case of a company reorganization or relocation, the policy is
> supportive to that case.
>
> In some regions, this may not be a policy, but an administrative
> procedure, but this may change in the future by means of a policy proposal.
>
> In the caser of inter-RIR, the counterpart RIR need to have a reciprocal
> policy or procedure that allows it.
>
> Finally, there should not be differences from the APNIC perspective, on
> the considerations of an M&A for different type of resources, because
> there is no reason for allowing, for example, IPv4 resources to be
> transferred, and instead IPv6 ones not. For example, an organization may
> be hosting services in a Data Center, by means of Virtual Machines and
> moving to a different DC in another region. It is ridiculous to allow to
> keep the IPv4 addresses (so not renumber the VMs) and instead ask to
> renumber IPv6. It is a big and unnecessary disruptive complexity.
>
>
> 2. Objective of policy change
> ------------------------------
> To ensure that the policy text is clarified, if those cases are
> supported by the community.
>
> It will also facilitate companies or business units, moving or being
> established in other regions.
>
> It will minimize legal issues in case an acquisition claiming their
> rights over the acquired company and their existing assets (resources).
>
>
> 3. Situation in other regions
> ------------------------------
> There is a variety of support of all those cases in different regions.
> The one more open is RIPE, followed by ARIN and LACNIC. A similar policy
> proposal is being discussed in AFRINIC.
>
>
> 4. Proposed policy solution
> ----------------------------
> Actual Text
> 8.4. Mergers & acquisitions
> APNIC will process and record the transfer of IPv4 resources as the
> result of merger or acquisition.
>
> 11.0. Transfer of IPv6 resources
> APNIC will only recognize the transfer or IPv6 addresses as the result
> of Merger & Acquisition activity. The following conditions and
> consequences apply.
>
> 13.3. Mergers & acquisitions
> APNIC will recognize the transfer of ASNs as the result of merger or
> acquisition.
>
>
> Proposed Text
> 8.4. Mergers, acquisitions and relocations
> APNIC will recognize the transfer of IPv4 resources resulting from a
> partial or complete merger, acquisition, reorganization or relocation.
>
> In the case of inter-RIR, the counterpart RIR need to have a reciprocal
> policy/procedure that allows it.
>
>
> 11.0. Transfer of IPv6 resources
> APNIC will recognize the transfer or IPv6 resources resulting from a
> partial or complete merger, acquisition, reorganization or relocation.
>
> In the case of inter-RIR, the counterpart RIR need to have a reciprocal
> policy/procedure that allows it.
>
>
> 13.3. Mergers, acquisitions and relocations
> APNIC will recognize the transfer of ASNs resulting from a partial or
> complete merger, acquisition, reorganization or relocation.
>
> In the case of inter-RIR, the counterpart RIR need to have a reciprocal
> policy/procedure that allows it.
>
>
> 5. Advantages / Disadvantages
> -----------------------------
> Advantages:
> Fulfilling the objectives above indicated and ensuring clarity on what
> is allowed and what not.
>
> The proposal makes clear that this may only happen, in case of Inter-RIR
> cases, when both RIRs have a reciprocal policy.
>
> Minimizing possible legal issues.
>
>
> Disadvantages:
> It could be considered that it can create further disaggregation,
> especially in IPv6, however, those cases are rare and only happening
> from time to time, so the impact is negligible, and justified by the
> documentation provided when the transfer is requested.
>
> In the Inter-RIR cases, coordination with the counter-part RIR is
> needed, but this is already an ongoing activity because all the regions
> (with the exception of AFRINIC), already have those mechanisms in place
> (for both, administrative and technical aspects).
>
>
> 6. Impact on resource holders
> ------------------------------
> None.
>
>
> 7. References
> --------------
> RIPE NCC:
>  https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-682
>
> ARIN:
>  https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#eight2
>
> LACNIC:
>  https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2019-4/language/en
>  https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2019-3/language/en
>  https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2019-2/language/en
> _______________________________________________
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>    *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to