I am in favour of this.

-- 
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208   http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane


On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 10:34 AM Bertrand Cherrier <b.cherr...@mynet.nc>
wrote:

> Dear SIG members,
>
> A new proposal "prop-155-v001: IPv6 PI assignment for associate members"
> has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
>
> It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting (OPM) at APNIC 56 on
> Thursday, 14 September 2023.
>
> https://conference.apnic.net/56/program/program/#/day/8/
>
> We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list
> before the OPM.
>
> The comment period on the mailing list before the OPM is an important
> part of the Policy Development Process (PDP). We encourage you to
> express your views on the proposal:
>
>    - Do you support or oppose this proposal?
>    - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so,
>      tell the community about your situation.
>    - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
>    - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
>    - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective?
>
> Information about this proposal is appended below as well as available at:
>
> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-155
>
> Regards,
> Bertrand, Shaila, and Anupam
> APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> prop-155-v001: IPv6 PI assignment for associate members
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Proposer: Aftab Siddiqui (aftab.siddi...@gmail.com)
>            Simon Baroi (sba...@gmail.com)
>
>
> 1. Problem statement
> --------------------
> The first tier of membership in APNIC is called "Associate." According
> to APNIC-121 (APNIC Membership: Tiers and Voting rights) Section 2.1 and
> 2.2, Associate members do not receive any IPv4 or IPv6 address space.
> However, APNIC Members with a delegated IPv4 address block but no IPv6
> space are instantly eligible for an appropriately sized IPv6 block
> without restrictions.
>
> If an entity requests only IPv6 assignment and has no IPv4 delegation,
> then as per APNIC-127 section 9.1.4 "Provider Independent IPv6
> assignments” they must submit a detailed usage plan for at least 12
> months following the allocation, with a minimum assignment size of /48.
> This incurs annual fees of AUD 1,180 based on the HD ratio.
>
> This policy is seen as a barrier to deploying IPv6, especially for
> personal use, as it doesn't incentivize IPv6 assignment alone. The
> proposal aims to address this issue by providing a Provider Independent
> assignment to Associate members with minimum justifiable eligibility.
> This change will remove the barrier and facilitate IPv6 deployment.
>
>
> 2. Objective of policy change
> -----------------------------
> Provide an incentive to small enterprises and academia/researchers to
> receive IPv6 assignment.
>
>
> 3. Situation in other regions
> -----------------------------
> RIPE NCC: IPv6 PI can be sponsored by an LIR (EUR 50/yr)
> ARIN: As an end-user IPv6 only can be requested following certain criteria
> AFRINIC: Must not be an LIR
> LACNIC: Not been an LIR or ISP, submit addressing plans for at least a year
>
>
> https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/RIR-Comparative-Policy-Overview-2023-Q2.pdf
>
> Section 3.4.3 - END USERS
>
>
> 4. Proposed policy solution
> ---------------------------
> Summary of Proposed Changes:
> Allow associate members to apply for IPv6 PI resources with minimum
> justification criteria as currently specified in Section 9.1.4 of
> APNIC-114, provided that the member will use the resources in the next
> 12 months period.
>
> Update APNIC-114 "APNIC guidelines for IPv6 allocation and assignment
> requests" Section 9 as follows:
>
> Current: Organizations with a previously delegated IPv4 assignment from
> APNIC are eligible for an appropriately sized IPv6 block under Section
> 9.2.1 of the “APNIC Internet Number Resource Policies“.
>
> Proposed:
> Eligibility:
> Organizations or individuals with no previously delegated IPv4
> assignment from APNIC or any other Regional Internet Registry (RIR) are
> eligible to apply for a /48 IPv6 PI assignment.
>
> Eligible entities must meet the requirements specified in the APNIC
> policies for IPv6 PI assignments, including justification for the
> requested address space as specific in Section 9.1.4
>
> Agreement to Announce IPv6 Address Space:
> Organizations or individuals receiving a /48 IPv6 PI assignment must
> agree to use and announce the IPv6 address space within twelve (12)
> months from the assignment date.
>
> Monitoring and Reclamation:
> APNIC hostmasters may monitor the IPv6 address space allocated to ensure
> its utilization.
>
> If, after the twelve (12) month period, the IPv6 address space is not
> announced or APNIC hostmasters determine that it is not in use for the
> intended purpose, the assigned IPv6 address space shall be subject to
> reclamation.
>
> Reclaimed IPv6 address space will be returned to the free pool for
> reassignment to other eligible entities.
>
>
> Update APNIC-127 Section 9.1.4. APNIC Internet Number Resource Policies
>
> Eligibility:
> Applicants who can commit to using and advertising the IPv6 address
> space within twelve (12) months from the date of assignment are eligible
> for an IPv6 Provider Independent delegation.
>
> Initial Assignment:
> The initial IPv6 PI assignment to eligible applicants will be a /48 IPv6
> block.
>
> Subsequent Assignment:
> For additional IPv6 address space requirements exceeding /48, applicants
> must follow the guidelines specified in Section 9.2, "Subsequent
> Assignments," as defined by the APNIC policies (APNIC-127).
>
> Subsequent assignments will be evaluated based on the applicant's
> demonstrated need and adherence to APNIC's IPv6 allocation policies.
>
>
> Membership Tier and Fee Structure Recommendations for EC (out of scope
> of policy-sig)
>
> - Update APNIC 121 (APNIC Membership: Tiers and Voting rights) Section
> 2.2 as per below structure. There will be no change in the membership
> tier after receiving IPv6 PI address space.
>
> +-----------------+-------------------------------------------+
> | Membership tier |                IPv6 prefix                |
> +-----------------+-------------------------------------------+
> | Associate       | /48                                       |
> |                 |                                           |
> | Very small      | Greater than /48, up to and including /35 |
> +-----------------+-------------------------------------------+
> - IPv6 PI address space assigned under this policy will be excluded from
> Annual Fee calculation as defined in APNIC-120 Section 1 (Fee Schedule)
> and will be termed as non-chargeable resource.
>
> IPv6 PI address space will be non-transferable.
>
>
> 5. Advantages / Disadvantages
> -----------------------------
> Advantages:
> This will give incentive to those small enterprises and academics
> willing to use their own IPv6 addresses but not in a position to be a
> very small tier member.
>
>
> Disadvantages:
>   - This might slightly increase overhead for hostmasters.
>   - The possible effect of this proposal in the growth of the global
> routing table
>
>
>
> 6. Impact on resource holders
> -----------------------------
> No impact on existing resource holders.
>
>
> 7. References
> -------------
>
> https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/RIR-Comparative-Policy-Overview-2023-Q2.pdf
>
>
> Section 3.4.3 - END USERS
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIG-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/sig-policy@lists.apnic.net/
> To unsubscribe send an email to sig-policy-le...@lists.apnic.net
_______________________________________________
SIG-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/sig-policy@lists.apnic.net/
To unsubscribe send an email to sig-policy-le...@lists.apnic.net

Reply via email to