ultra cool.
it worked beautifully. i had to alter a ifup script since the old path for
dhcpcd was hard coded, but after that the new one work painlessly.
now i just need to play with ip chains to un-isolate my nt box.
I STILL NEED A REPLY ABOUT THOSE FLYERS I MADE!
should i proceed to distribute them upon terse consent?
http://sacrilege.org/siglinux.sdw.gz
( you'll need StarOffice5.0 to view it )
thanks nolan,
Nolan Darilek wrote:
> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:50:13 -0500
> From: tom carlile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Precedence: bulk
> Reply-To: tom carlile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> does anyone know what i need? any roadrunners using v2.2?
> if so can you tell me exactly what you enabled?
> i'm network isolated in v2.2, which is about to drive me mad.
>
> Hmm. I think I remember reading quite some time ago (so I might be
> wrong :) that 2.1.xx (And presumably 2.2) kernels need a newer version
> of DHCPCD, due to a new IOCTL interface. That might be the problem. I
> want to say that dhcpcd 1.0 and up are good, though that's only a
> semi-educated guess. :) Try grabbing the newest version and see if
> that helps.
>
> --
>
> Nolan Darilek
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ICQ: 15709478
> http://resnet-21-203.dorm.utexas.edu/~nolan
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> C Code.
> C Code Run.
> Run, Code, RUN!
> PLEASE!!!!
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Tom Carlile [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- randomly generated Star Wars quote:
To be a Jedi you must confront and then go beyond the dark side.
-- Yoda
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
